ReviewThe Medical journal of Australia2025
Models of care across settings supporting ageing in place: a narrative review.
Review in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Primary Health Care Services and Continuity of Care Are Associated With Better Health Outcomes in the Older Population.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Geriatric Interdisciplinary Team Care Model: An Integrated Model for Older Adults.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Older people's preference is to age in place. With an ageing population, the demand for services that are effective in supporting older people to live at home independently has increased dramatically. This narrative review provides an overview of recent evidence of models of care in the aged and community care and health care sectors that contribute to supporting older people (≥ 65 years) to age in place (ie, delay or avoid entry into residential long term care). Overall, there is limited evidence for the identified models of care about the outcome of ageing in place, but there is evidence of positive contributions to other aspects of wellbeing. Complex multifactorial care models, particularly those that are person-centred, address the health and social needs of older people in the community, include comprehensive assessment and care planning, and are delivered by a multidisciplinary clinical team, had the most consistent evidence for supporting older people to age in place. Specialist geriatric care and home-based palliative team care models have robust evidence of assisting individuals to achieve their aims to stay and to die at home. However, how these complex multifactorial care models work (ie, what elements contribute to success) and how to scale up specialist team care models are substantial challenges. No panacea exists for supporting all people to age in place, but care integration, collaboration among care settings, and multidisciplinary person-centred clinical care that addresses health-related decline and challenges are consistently reported to contribute to its success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.