Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661201›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

A comprehensive review of recent advances in the extraction and therapeutic potential of berberine.

Shiyu Huang, Gangliang Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shiyu HuangKey Laboratory of Carbohydrate Science and Engineering, Chongqing Normal University Chongqing 401331 China.
Gangliang HuangKey Laboratory of Carbohydrate Science and Engineering, Chongqing Normal University Chongqing 401331 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8768-9979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction methods of berberine hydrochloride include water, acidified water, lime milk, and ethanol extraction. The water extraction method is mainly a decoction method, whereas the alcohol extraction method mainly includes microwave, ultrasonic and cable reflux extraction. In the alcohol extraction method, the solvent has low restriction and can be used repeatedly, making the operation simple and increasing the extraction rate; however, the equipment investment for ultrasonic extraction and other methods is substantial. This method can shorten the extraction time and achieve a higher extraction rate; however, it has disadvantages such as high solvent cost, large solvent amount, difficult recovery, hidden danger of safety in operation, the extraction process involving heating steps, and high energy consumption. Thus, it is not suitable for industrial mass production. The extraction processes of sour water and lime milk are relatively simple and inexpensive, which are commonly used in industry at present; however, the lime milk method consumes a considerable amount of lime milk. Therefore, considering production maneuverability and cost, the acid-water impregnation method is easier for industrial implementation. Berberine has many functions, including antibacterial effects, anti-inflammatory effects, detoxification, and lowering of blood sugar and blood fat levels. To clarify the hypoglycemic mechanism of berberine, a better understanding of its pharmacological effects is helpful, providing a basis for the rational application of berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Identifiers

PMID40661201
PMCPMC12257298

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.