Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661269›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Lack of children in public medical imaging data points to growing age bias in biomedical AI.

Stanley Bryan Zamora Hua, Nicholas Heller, Ping He, Alexander J Towbin, Irene Y Chen, Alex X Lu, Lauren Erdman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stanley Bryan Zamora HuaCenter for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2291-1572
Nicholas HellerDepartment of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-8707
Ping HeCenter for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Alexander J TowbinDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1729-5071
Irene Y ChenComputational Precision Health, University of California Berkeley and University of California San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0173-9133
Alex X LuMicrosoft Research, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9568-3155
Lauren ErdmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-2669

Funding

MEDICAL IMAGING AND DATA RESOURCE CENTER (MIDRC) YEAR 375N92020D00021 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN · 2021 to 2025
$16.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020D00021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, but its benefits are not reaching all patients equally. Children remain overlooked with only 17% of FDA-approved medical AI devices labeled for pediatric use. In this work, we demonstrate that this exclusion may stem from a fundamental data gap. Our systematic review of 181 public medical imaging datasets reveals that children represent just under 1% of available data, while the majority of machine learning imaging conference papers we surveyed utilized publicly available data for methods development. Much like systematic biases of other kinds in model development, past studies have demonstrated the manner in which pediatric representation in data used for models intended for the pediatric population is essential for model performance in that population. We add to these findings, showing that adult-trained chest radiograph models exhibit significant age bias when applied to pediatric populations, with higher false positive rates in younger children. This work underscores the urgent need for increased pediatric representation in publicly accessible medical datasets. We provide actionable recommendations for researchers, policymakers, and data curators to address this age equity gap and ensure AI benefits patients of all ages.

Identifiers

PMID40661269
PMCPMC12259205

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.