ArticleClinical cardiology2025
Tolerability and Adverse Effects in a Specialized Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization Program.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Bridging Guidelines and Real World Barriers: Reflections on GDMT Optimization in Heart Failure".Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- Revisiting the Boundaries of GDMT Optimization: Beyond Adverse Effects and Into the Future of Personalized Heart Failure Care.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUtilization of heart failure (HF) guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) to target doses is suboptimal, with studies citing adverse effects (AEs), physiological factors, and therapeutic inertia as potential contributing factors. The objective of our study was to explore tolerability and GDMT titration-limiting AEs in a specialized heart failure optimization program implemented at our institution.
methodsWe studied the baseline characteristics of 254 patients who successfully completed our program and analyzed the frequency and severity of the four most common GDMT-related AEs: hypotension, bradycardia, hyperkalemia, and renal dysfunction.
resultsPatients who achieved target doses were younger, more likely to have nonischemic HF, less likely to have a recent HF-related hospitalization, had less coronary artery disease, and were more likely to be obese. Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations between beta blocker suboptimal dosing (< 50% of target dose) and older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-1.07; p = 0.031), presence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.18-5.58; p = 0.017), and absence of hypertension (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.89; p = 0.025). For angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, suboptimal dosing was associated with the presence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.04-4.17; p = 0.039). Of the patients who completed the program, 59.1% encountered at least one AE that hindered the titration to target GDMT doses.
conclusionOur findings highlight the complexities of GDMT optimization within a specialized program and the need for standardized definitions of GDMT-related AEs and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.