Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662449›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2025

Tolerability and Adverse Effects in a Specialized Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization Program.

Claudia Mae Velasco, Gladys Baksh, Michele Haydo, Heather Reesor, John Boehmer, Omaima Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia Mae VelascoPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0606-817X
Gladys BakshDivision of Cardiology, Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michele HaydoDivision of Cardiology, Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Heather ReesorPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
John BoehmerDivision of Cardiology, Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Omaima AliDivision of Cardiology, Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

This study was supported by the Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute by facilitating aspects of this study, including data collection and database management.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUtilization of heart failure (HF) guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) to target doses is suboptimal, with studies citing adverse effects (AEs), physiological factors, and therapeutic inertia as potential contributing factors. The objective of our study was to explore tolerability and GDMT titration-limiting AEs in a specialized heart failure optimization program implemented at our institution.

methodsWe studied the baseline characteristics of 254 patients who successfully completed our program and analyzed the frequency and severity of the four most common GDMT-related AEs: hypotension, bradycardia, hyperkalemia, and renal dysfunction.

resultsPatients who achieved target doses were younger, more likely to have nonischemic HF, less likely to have a recent HF-related hospitalization, had less coronary artery disease, and were more likely to be obese. Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations between beta blocker suboptimal dosing (< 50% of target dose) and older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-1.07; p = 0.031), presence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.18-5.58; p = 0.017), and absence of hypertension (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.89; p = 0.025). For angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, suboptimal dosing was associated with the presence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.04-4.17; p = 0.039). Of the patients who completed the program, 59.1% encountered at least one AE that hindered the titration to target GDMT doses.

conclusionOur findings highlight the complexities of GDMT optimization within a specialized program and the need for standardized definitions of GDMT-related AEs and management strategies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsGuideline AdherenceHeart FailurePractice Guidelines as TopicAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBradycardiaFemaleHumansHyperkalemiaHypotensionLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCardiovascular Agentsadverse drug reactionsguideline‐directed medical therapyheart failure with reduced ejection fractiontolerance

Identifiers

PMID40662449
PMCPMC12261027

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.