Evidence mapPaperPMID 40662616Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2025

Consideration on Food Effect Studies for Anticancer Drugs Approved in Japan Between 2001 and 2022.

Maho Shibuya, Hayataka Kubota, Hideki Maeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maho ShibuyaRegulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5287-0956
Hayataka KubotaRegulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki MaedaRegulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0117-3961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In developing a new drug, studies to evaluate the food effect (FE) on the drug's pharmacokinetics (FE studies) are generally conducted in healthy subjects in the early stages of clinical development. Conversely, for anticancer drugs, which have many adverse effects, it is assumed that FE studies cannot be conducted in healthy subjects. However, many unknowns exist about how FE on oral anticancer drugs is examined in clinical development. In this study, we aimed to examine the characteristics of conducting FE studies on anticancer drugs approved in Japan to date. Between 2001 and 2022, 70 new oral anticancer drugs had been approved in Japan. Of the 70 drugs, 67 (95.7%) were subjected to FE studies. Ninety-five FE studies were conducted on these 67 oral anticancer drugs. Sixty-three studies (66.3%) were conducted on (1) healthy subjects. Most studies were (2) single-dose, (3) single-dosage arm, (4) nonrandomized, (5) crossover, and (6) with a sample size of 11-30 cases. In addition, 80 (84.2%) of the FE studies were conducted ex-Japan, not in Japan. Furthermore, the results of the chi-square test indicated that "(1) drugs using ex-Japan clinical data" "(2) drugs other than cytotoxic anticancer drugs" "(3) drugs developed ex-Japan" and "(4) drugs with > 100 cases in pivotal trials" were more likely to be subjected to FE studies. In conclusion, in FE studies, clinical trials in healthy subjects rather than patients have already been conducted in response to changes in the modality from cytotoxic drugs to molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsFood-Drug InteractionsNeoplasmsAdministration, OralClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalHealthy VolunteersHumansJapanAntineoplastic Agentsanticancer drugclinical developmentfood effectmolecular target drugmultiregional clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID40662616
PMCPMC12261266

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.