ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
Construction and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using multimodal clinical data: a single-center, retrospective study.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable AI for treatment decision-making in immunoradiotherapy of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEarly detection and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are critical for improving patient prognosis. The aim of this study is to develop and compare multiple machine learning (ML) models using multimodal clinical data to identify a predictive model for NPC risk, increase diagnostic accuracy, and guide personalized treatment strategies.
methodsClinical data were retrospectively collected from 1337 patients suspected of having NPC at the First People's Hospital of Yulin. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Patients were divided into training and test sets (80:20 ratio), and seven ML models were developed based on the training set. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The best-performing model was further evaluated through decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and learning curves. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret key clinical features.
resultsSeven models were developed using 17 clinical features selected from 53 parameters. The gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model demonstrated superior performance (AUC of 0.95 in the training cohort and 0.82 in the validation cohort). Calibration curves and DCA confirmed the model's strong accuracy and clinical benefit. SHAP analysis revealed that age, lymphocyte percentage, serum albumin, sex, and EBV IgM were the five most significant predictors of NPC risk.
conclusionThe GBDT-based ML model, using multimodal clinical data, accurately identifies patients at high risk for NPC, providing a valuable tool for early screening and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40663182What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.