Evidence mapPaperPMID 40663182Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Construction and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using multimodal clinical data: a single-center, retrospective study.

Xiao Li, Zuheng Wang, Wenting Chen, Chunmeng Wei, Wenhao Lu, Rongbin Zhou, Fubo Wang, Leifeng Liang

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao Li *School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Zuheng Wang *Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Wenting Chen *Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Chunmeng WeiCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Wenhao LuCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Rongbin ZhouCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Fubo WangSchool of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China. wangfubo@gxmu.edu.cn.
Leifeng LiangDepartment of Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Yulin, 495 Education Middle Road, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China. liangleifeng@stu.gxmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-4100

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372828the Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi AA22096030the Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi AA22096032the Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangxi 2023GXNSFFA026003the Yongjiang Program of Nanning 2021015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly detection and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are critical for improving patient prognosis. The aim of this study is to develop and compare multiple machine learning (ML) models using multimodal clinical data to identify a predictive model for NPC risk, increase diagnostic accuracy, and guide personalized treatment strategies.

methodsClinical data were retrospectively collected from 1337 patients suspected of having NPC at the First People's Hospital of Yulin. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Patients were divided into training and test sets (80:20 ratio), and seven ML models were developed based on the training set. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The best-performing model was further evaluated through decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and learning curves. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret key clinical features.

resultsSeven models were developed using 17 clinical features selected from 53 parameters. The gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model demonstrated superior performance (AUC of 0.95 in the training cohort and 0.82 in the validation cohort). Calibration curves and DCA confirmed the model's strong accuracy and clinical benefit. SHAP analysis revealed that age, lymphocyte percentage, serum albumin, sex, and EBV IgM were the five most significant predictors of NPC risk.

conclusionThe GBDT-based ML model, using multimodal clinical data, accurately identifies patients at high risk for NPC, providing a valuable tool for early screening and personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceMachine learningNasopharyngeal carcinomaRisk prediction

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.