Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663247›Full record

ReviewVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2025

Placenta segmentation redefined: review of deep learning integration of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound imaging.

Asmaa Jittou, Khalid El Fazazy, Jamal Riffi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asmaa JittouLaboratory of Computer Science, Innovation, and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Science Dhar El Mahraz, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, 30000, Fes, Morocco. asmaa.jittou@usmba.ac.ma.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2712-0021
Khalid El FazazyLaboratory of Computer Science, Innovation, and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Science Dhar El Mahraz, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, 30000, Fes, Morocco.
Jamal RiffiLaboratory of Computer Science, Innovation, and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Science Dhar El Mahraz, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, 30000, Fes, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placental segmentation is critical for the quantitative analysis of prenatal imaging applications. However, segmenting the placenta using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound is challenging because of variations in fetal position, dynamic placental development, and image quality. Most segmentation methods define regions of interest with different shapes and intensities, encompassing the entire placenta or specific structures. Recently, deep learning has emerged as a key approach that offer high segmentation performance across diverse datasets. This review focuses on the recent advances in deep learning techniques for placental segmentation in medical imaging, specifically MRI and ultrasound modalities, and cover studies from 2019 to 2024. This review synthesizes recent research, expand knowledge in this innovative area, and highlight the potential of deep learning approaches to significantly enhance prenatal diagnostics. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate imaging modalities and model architectures tailored to specific clinical scenarios. In addition, integrating both MRI and ultrasound can enhance segmentation performance by leveraging complementary information. This review also discusses the challenges associated with the high costs and limited availability of advanced imaging technologies. It provides insights into the current state of placental segmentation techniques and their implications for improving maternal and fetal health outcomes, underscoring the transformative impact of deep learning on prenatal diagnostics.

Indexed as

Deep learningMagnetic resonance imagingPlacentaSegmentationUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID40663247
PMCPMC12263505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.