ArticleScientific reports2025
The prognostic importance of the global immune-nutrition-information index (GINI) in patients with Ras wild type metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Global Immune-Nutrition-Inflammation Index Is Associated with Survival Outcomes and Enhances Prognostic Discrimination in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Dynamic Immune-Nutritional Indices as Powerful Predictors of Pathological Complete Response in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The global immune-nutrition-inflammation index predicts pathological response and survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the Global Immune-Nutrition Information Index (GINI) in patients with Ras wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received first-line palliative chemotherapy Ras wild-type mCRC. We retrospectively reviewed 177 patients diagnosed with Ras Wild Type mCRC between March 2009 and December 2023. The GINI was defined as follows: GINI= [C-reactive protein×platelet×monocyte×neutrophil]/[albumin×lymphocyte]. According to threshold values determined by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, the GINI was divided into two groups with < 2000 and ≥ 2000. Survival probabilities were predicted with the Kaplan-Meier method and group comparisons were applied with the Log-rank test. Furthermore, univariate and multiple Cox regression analyses were used to determine the most substantial risk elements. Median progression-free survival (PFS) 15 months in the group with GINI ≥ 2000 (95% Confidence interval (CI): 10.5-19.48) and 27 months (95% CI: 17.5-36.4) in the group with GINI < 2000 (p = 0.00021). The median OS was 27 months (95% CI: 23.8-30.1) in the GINI ≥ 2000 group and 77 months (95% CI: 59.7-94.2) in the GINI < 2000 group (p < 0.001). The results of multivariate analysis for PFS showed that albumin (HR, 1.83, p = 0.009), and prechemotherapy GINI (HR 1.79, p = 0.004) were significant independent prognostic factors. The results of multivariate analysis for OS showed that performance status (HR, 1.65; p = 0.018), number of metastatic sites (HR, 1.74, 0.005), skin toxicity (HR, 1.79, p = 0.003), pre-chemotherapy NLR (HR, 1.49, p = 0.045) and prechemotherapy GINI (HR 3.25, p < 0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors. Higher GINI values were associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC, supporting its potential clinical use as a prognostic biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.