ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-like associations between gut microbiome composition and inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity in dogs.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Repeated Task Exposure and Sufficient Sleep May Mitigate ADHD-Related Cognitive Flexibility Impairments in Family Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dogs exhibit natural variability in inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity traits, sometimes with extreme manifestations resembling to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in humans. Using human-standard diagnostic methods, we developed a comprehensive approach for supporting diagnosing ADHD in dogs (N = 1872) based on a validated questionnaire that consists of two parts: a symptom section that provides factor scores for three areas (inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), and a functionality section that evaluates the extent to which these symptoms cause functional impairments. Based on the functionality section, we classified dogs as functionally impaired if they showed impairment in at least 4 out of the 7 questions of at least one area (n = 116; 6.2% of the sample). Then, we projected the impaired-non-impaired categories on the ADHD total scores of the symptom section to establish potential cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis resulted in an excellent AUC value (0.861). A cutoff score of 26 was established based on well-defined sensitivity and specificity trade-offs. Finally, we applied the combined thresholds of the two parts of the questionnaire to identify dogs at-risk vs. non-at-risk for ADHD (n = 79; 4.22% of the sample). We offer the first replicable method to screen dogs with suspected ADHD. A final diagnosis could be set after dog-owner pairs participate in relevant behavioural tests and an expert consultation. Allowing for comparisons between ADHD vs. typical groups of family dogs, our method not only facilitates the improvement of the wellbeing of at-risk dogs, but also makes it more feasible to use dogs as a natural model species for studying ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.