ArticleScientific reports2025
Objective monitoring of motor symptom severity and their progression in Parkinson's disease using a digital gait device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future digital outpatient clinic for movement disorders: from technological innovation to ethical and systemic implementation-a position paper.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of digital technologies in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Brain age gap as predictor of disease progression in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- L-Dopa Comparably Improves Gait and Limb Movements in Parkinson's Disease: A Wearable Sensor Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital technologies for monitoring motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD) underwent a strong evolution during the past years. Although it has been shown for several devices that derived digital gait features can reliably discriminate between healthy controls and people with PD, the specific gait tasks best suited for monitoring motor symptoms and especially their progression, remain unclear. Furthermore, the potential benefit as endpoint in a clinical trial context has not been investigated so far. In this study we employed a digital gait device manufactured by Portabiles HCT, which has been used by 339 patients within the LuxPark cohort (n = 161, Luxembourg) as well as within routine clinical care visits at the University Medical Center Erlangen (n = 178, Erlangen, Germany). Linear (mixed) models were used to assess the association of task-specific digital gait features with disease progression and motor symptom severity measured by several clinical scores. Furthermore, we employed machine learning to evaluate whether digital gait assessments were prognostic for patient-level motor symptom progression. Overall, digital gait features derived from Portabiles digital gait device were found to effectively monitor motor symptoms and their longitudinal progression. At the same time the prognostic performance of digital gait features was limited. However, we could show a strong reduction in required sample size, if digital gait features were employed as surrogates for traditional endpoints in a clinical trial context. Thus, Portabiles digital gait device provides an effective way to objectively monitor motor symptoms and their progression in PD. Furthermore, the digital gait device bears strong potential as an alternative and easily assessable endpoint predictor in a clinical trial context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.