ArticleScientific reports2025
A wavelet-guided transformer approach for autofocus in brightfield biological microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CG-RecNet: a gated and attention-fused deep learning framework for label-free classification of neural stem cell differentiation via imaging flow cytometry.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autofocus plays a crucial role in Biological Microscopy by ensuring image clarity and improving operational efficiency. However, mainstream brightfield biological microscopes still rely on conventional autofocus methods, which suffer from poor real-time performance and high sensitivity to noise, limiting their applicability in time-critical scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose a Wavelet-Guided Transformer Network (WGT-Net) that enables fast and accurate autofocus prediction from a single blurred image. WGT-Net integrates three key design elements: the use of wavelet transform to construct multi-scale blurred features and perform downsampling; a Transformer module that captures global-local dependencies across multi-scale image features; a Gaussian soft labeling strategy that models the optimal focus position as a probability distribution to handle uncertainty. Experiments conducted on a locally collected dataset demonstrate that WGT-Net achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0869 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.101, achieving 28.69% and 32.39% reductions in MAE and RMSE, respectively, compared with state-of-the-art methods, and completing predictions within milliseconds. These results demonstrate that WGT-Net significantly improves both prediction accuracy and real-time performance, highlighting its suitability for real-time, high-throughput Brightfield Biological Microscopy applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.