ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025
Sexual and gender minoritized persons in organ and tissue donation: a qualitative analysis.
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexual and Gender Minorities in Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation (OTDT): A Survey of Canadian OTDT Health Care Workers.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026Article
- Organ and tissue donation and transplantation in people who identify as Two-Spirit, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and more: a Canada-wide cross-sectional community survey.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSexual and gender minoritized persons (SGMs) experience inequities, harms, and gaps in care in organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) systems. The experiences of SGMs navigating OTDT have not been published from their own perspectives.
methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews, transcribed verbatim, and performed a formal qualitative best-fit framework synthesis and inductive thematic analysis with an SGM OTDT patient and caregiver advisory team (N = 12/13) to characterize their self-described experiences.
resultsEmergent themes included: 1) stigma, discriminatory criteria, and inertia to change; 2) OTDT patient and community relations; 3) benefits, strength, and resilience of the SGM community; and 4) SGM priorities and opportunities for improvement. Each theme and its respective subthemes are presented with representative quotes.
conclusionsOur novel findings detail the ways that SGMs experience OTDT health care, highlighting the harms of discriminatory donor risk assessment criteria and the need for equitable policy revision. Opportunities to enhance inclusive care include institutional acknowledgement of inequities and transparent communication, target training for health care providers, and intersectional SGM and OTDT caregiver support networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.