Observational studyBMC public health2025
Resilience and traumatic stress among Latinx english language learners: a cross-sectional study of students from an urban school district.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLatinx students in the United States can face stressors and structural inequities that can lead to poor academic and mental health outcomes. They comprise 76% of the English Language Learner (ELL) population, yet little is known about the relationship between ELL status and traumatic stress and resilience outcomes among these Latinx students. We sought to see if resilience differs between ELL vs. non-ELL Latinx students, and if traumatic stress risk modifies the association between ELL designation and resilience among Latinx students to inform culturally relevant school resilience interventions and school-wide approaches for this population.
methodsWe analyzed deidentified school district administrative and survey data from a convenience sample of mostly Latinx 6-12th graders from one large, urban U.S. school district. We restricted our sample to Latinx students, resulting in a sample of 4,950 students attending 91 middle and high schools. We constructed linear regression models to understand differences in internal and external resilience based on ELL status, traumatic stress risk, and their interaction.
resultsAmong students with low traumatic stress risk, ELL students had worse self-efficacy but better problem solving than their non-ELL peers. When considering students with high traumatic stress risk, ELL students had better problem solving, self-awareness, perceived school support, and total internal assets, relative to non-ELL students.
conclusionsLatinx students designated as ELL may demonstrate resilience despite adversity; these resilience assets may be further amplified among the subset of students at high risk for traumatic stress. Our findings may inform school resilience interventions and school supports for ELL Latinx students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.