ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia in a real-world hospital cohort.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Multi-Label Adverse drug Reaction Extraction from Malaysia's National Pharmacovigilance Narratives.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Forecasting migraine with time-series machine learning from mobile health data.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Drug Safety Across the Lifecycle and Decision Type: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction, often underrecognized due to its nonspecific presentation and the lack of real-time diagnostic tools. Early identification of at-risk patients is critical to improving medication safety and preventing severe complications.
objectiveTo develop and externally validate a machine learning model for predicting the risk of DITP using routinely collected hospital data, and to optimize its clinical applicability through threshold adjustment.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from Hai Phong International Hospital (2018-2024) for model development and internal validation. An independent cohort from Hai Phong International Hospital - Vinh Bao (2024) served as external validation. Eligible patients received at least one drug previously implicated in DITP and had serial platelet counts. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model was trained on demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pharmacological features. Model performance was assessed using area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, and F1-score. Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature contributions. Threshold tuning and decision curve analysis (DCA) supported clinical applicability.
resultsAmong 17,546 patients in the training cohort and 1,403 in the external cohort, DITP occurred in 432 (2.46%) and 70 (4.99%) patients, respectively. In internal validation, LightGBM achieved an AUC of 0.860, recall of 0.392, and F1-score of 0.310. External validation confirmed model robustness with an AUC of 0.813 and an F1-score of 0.341 at the optimized threshold (0.09). SHAP analysis identified AST, baseline platelet count, and renal function as key contributors. DCA and clinical impact curves demonstrated potential benefit in supporting real-time risk stratification. Clopidogrel and vancomycin were frequently associated with suspected DITP cases.
conclusionThis externally validated machine learning model enables early identification of hospitalized patients at risk of DITP using data available in routine care. Its integration into electronic medical records may support clinical decision-making, reduce diagnostic delays, and improve pharmacovigilance practices in hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.