ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2025
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and the pediatric rheumatologist: a pediatric needs assessment.
Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is increasing in pediatric oncology. ICIs can cause rheumatic-immune related adverse events (Rh-irAEs) such as inflammatory arthritis and myositis. Few case reports detail Rh-irAEs and their management in the pediatric population. Our objective was to assess the familiarity of pediatric rheumatologists (PRs) worldwide with Rh-irAEs, gauge confidence in managing these conditions, and identify knowledge gaps to guide future educational efforts.
methodsWe circulated an online survey to 2084 PRs via the "Dr. Peter Dent Pediatric Rheumatology Bulletin Board." Responses were collected from June 2024 to September 2024. We collected data on practitioner demographics, knowledge of ICIs and Rh-irAEs, confidence in managing Rh-irAEs, and preferred educational resources.
resultsSixty-nine participants responded, of which 55 (80%) were PRs from academic centers. Despite global distribution, 56 (81%) responses came from North America. Thirty-four (49%) respondents were not aware of ICIs and their related mechanisms, indications, and side effects, and 40 (58%) were not familiar with irAEs. Fifty-five (80%) had never managed a patient with Rh-irAEs. Among those who had (14/69, 21%), the median number of cases managed was 2.0 (IQR 0.0). Thirty-nine respondents were "not confident at all" managing Rh-irAEs, 34 were "not confident at all" managing pre-existing autoimmune diseases (PAD) in ICI users, and 46 were "not confident at all" advising oncology colleagues on initiating or discontinuing ICIs in the context of Rh-irAEs or pre-existing autoimmune diseases (PAD). No respondents felt "completely confident" managing these conditions. Participants identified knowledge gaps in long-term management, acute management, and recognition and diagnosis. Forty-three indicated the need for pediatric-specific clinical guidelines. Of the 14 respondents with clinical experience treating Rh-irAEs, treatment varied, with 4 using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 3 using prednisone, and 4 combining prednisone with methotrexate. Long-term management also varied, with 5 using methotrexate, and 3 using tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.
conclusionsSignificant knowledge gaps and a lack of confidence exist among PRs managing ICI-related Rh-irAEs. As ICI use increases in pediatric oncology, PRs' exposure to Rh-irAEs will follow. Targeted educational programs and clinical guidelines may be valuable to address these gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.