ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Global epidemiological trends and burden of cervical and subcervical spinal cord injuries, 1990-2021: a multidimensional analysis using global burden of disease data.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Global Burden of GBD-Defined Spinal Cord Lesions, 2014-2023: A Global Burden of Disease Analysis of the Geriatric Transition and Anatomical Distribution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Phase-dependent efficacy of intravenous amniotic mesenchymal stem cells in a rat spinal cord injury model.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Clec7a-targeted Res@GelMA hydrogels regulate macrophage polarization to reduce neuroinflammation and promote spinal cord repair.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Chinese and global trends in pediatric spinal cord injury burden (1990-2021) with projections to 2045.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) and subcervical spinal cord injury (SSCI) cause substantial motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction, with traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies. CSCI (C1-C8) and SSCI (T1-L1) impose severe individual and societal burdens. This study assessed global trends in SCI incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) from 1990 to 2021.
methodsData were drawn from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study. CSCI and SSCI cases were stratified by age, sex, and Socio-demographic Index (SDI). Age-standardized rates (ASR) and estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) were calculated. Future trends (2022-2050) were projected using ARIMA modeling.
resultsOur analysis revealed clear age-related patterns in SCI burden. Both CSCI and SSCI incidence, prevalence, and YLDs increased with advancing age, with CSCI predominantly affecting middle-aged adults and SSCI rising significantly among the elderly. Males consistently showed higher rates of CSCI and SSCI across both injury types, and significant sex-based differences were observed in YLDs. High-SDI regions experienced gradual decreases in ASR for CSCI, while low-SDI regions exhibited rapid increases in YLDs associated with CSCI, indicating a disparity in healthcare resource allocation. The growth rate of CSCI and SSCI burden was notably higher in low and middle-SDI countries, particularly for SSCI.
conclusionAlthough the overall burden of CSCI and SSCI is stabilizing or declining in certain regions, the global YLDs continue to rise, driven by population aging and insufficient healthcare infrastructure in low-SDI regions. CSCI lead to greater disability, and persistent gender and regional disparities highlight the need for targeted, equitable prevention and rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.