Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40667246›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

16p11.2 duplication shows early male-biased impacts on reward learning, but NMDA receptor antagonism reduces optimal choice selection in both wildtypes and 16p11.2 duplication.

Dana Mueller, Evan Knep, Angelica Velosa, Erin Giglio, Cathy S Chen, Sarah R Heilbronner, R Becket Ebitz, Patrick E Rothwell, Nicola M Grissom

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dana MuellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0002-3768-6347
Evan KnepDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.
Angelica VelosaDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.
Erin GiglioDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.
Cathy S ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.
Sarah R HeilbronnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX, 77030.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-5364
R Becket EbitzDepartment of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-9502
Patrick E RothwellDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0003-0514-2510
Nicola M GrissomDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0003-3630-8130

Funding

Using a computational and network neuroscience framework to study pharmacological manipulations of state representation processes in early psychosisP50MH119569 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH, Sophia Vinogradov · 2020 to 2026
$24.5M
Predoctoral Training of NeuroscientistsT32NS105604 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choiceR01MH123661 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRISSOM, NICOLA · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119569NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123661NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS105604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale: 16p11.2 duplication is associated with numerous neuropsychiatric conditions at a genome-wide level, including psychosis. Mice modeling 16p11.2 duplication may provide important insights into cognitive risk factors, in particular in reward-guided decision making. NMDAR function has also been implicated in psychosis phenotypes, but whether these phenotypes differ by genetic risk factor is unknown. Objectives: We aimed to: 1) identify sex and genotype differences in early operant training and two-arm spatial restless bandit task performance; 2) examine the effects of an NMDAR antagonist on task performance and strategy across genotypes. Methods: 16p11.2 duplication and wildtype mice completed a series of training schedules of escalating difficulty followed by bandit tasks. MK-801 and saline were administered in alternating sessions prior to later bandit task performance. Results: Large sex differences in early operant training revealed some male-biased impacts of 16p11.2 duplication, contingent on training schedule difficulty. Once on the two-arm spatial restless bandit task, 16p11.2 duplication was no longer a strong contributor to decision making. However, MK-801 decreased the tendency to stay with a rewarded choice, lowered the probability of selecting the highest rewarded option, and decreased the influence of prior outcomes on choice. Conclusions: The male-biased vulnerability in early operant training suggests that strategies for learning early schemas or in novel environments may be impacted by 16p11.2 duplication in males. In contrast, NMDAR are influential in the ability to flexibly switch between choices, and disrupting this function significantly impairs decision making in all animals.

Indexed as

16p11.2 duplicationBanditMK-801NMDAPsychosisReinforcement LearningSex Differences

Identifiers

PMID40667246
PMCPMC12262533

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.