ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025
A hematological and inflammatory marker-based model for prostate carcinoma diagnosis.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: Insights into genetic, RNA and metabolic markers (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate carcinoma (PC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related death among men in the United States, with over 160,000 new cases reported annually. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has advanced the early detection and management of PC, its diagnostic accuracy, particularly in distinguishing malignant from benign conditions, remains controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of early PC diagnosis by constructing a diagnostic model based on hematological indicators. Emerging inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were incorporated to supplement traditional PSA testing. This study employed a retrospective design and included 317 patients receiving prostate puncture at Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital of Guangdong Medical University between January 2019 and January 2022 as the research subjects. These patients were grouped into two categories: 126 diagnosed with PC and 191 diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia, based on histopathological examination of the biopsy samples. Clinical and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic medical record system. Diagnostic markers for PC were screened by logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated using ROC and decision curve analysis. PSA, Neu, Mono, CRP, NLR, NAR, and CK-MB were identified as independent diagnostic indicators, effectively distinguishing PC from benign prostatic hyperplasia. The LASSO regression-based predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.850, significantly outperforming the traditional logistic regression model (AUC=0.792; P=0.042, Delong test), indicating superior diagnostic accuracy and model performance. In conclusion, the combination of traditional PSA testing and emerging inflammatory markers can significantly enhances early diagnostic accuracy for PC and the proposed model offers a promising approach for early detection and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.