ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025
Adherence to GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors by out-of-pocket spending among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rates of, Reasons for, and Reactions to Discontinuation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Narrative Review.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
- From global guidelines for cardio-kidney-metabolic diseases management to national implementation: perspectives from the guideline workshop taskforce.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Metformin-Enhanced Digital Therapeutics for the Affordable Primary Prevention of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases: Advancing Low-Cost Solutions for Lifestyle-Related Chronic Disorders.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo assess associations between out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures and adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) among low-income Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analysed Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey two-year longitudinal data (2016-2021) on beneficiaries with diabetes using GLP-1RAs (N = 168; weighted = 2 187 500) or SGLT2i (N = 139; weighted = 1 741 910) in year one (baseline). Among these, N = 97 (weighted = 1 117 637) GLP-1RA and N = 73 (weighted = 785 301) SGLT2i users had an income below 200% of the Federal Poverty Level (low-income). Survey-weighted generalized Poisson regression assessed the association between baseline cumulative OOP drug expenses and year two adherence, defined as proportion of days covered (PDC). We repeated analyses in participants with higher income and using dual (Medicare/Medicaid) enrolment as a proxy for full coverage in low income.
resultsYear-two PDC was 65.2% (95% CI: 57.9%-72.6%) for low-income GLP-1RA users and 65.4% (95% CI: 58.3%-72.5%) for low-income SGLT2i users. We did not observe a significant association between OOP costs (mean: $253; range: $0-$4699) and adherence in low-income GLP-1RA users. For low-income SGLT2i users, higher OOP costs (mean: $204; $0-$2649) were associated with lower adherence: adjusted adherence ratio 0.959 (95% CI: 0.932-0.987) per $100 increase. Dual Medicare-Medicaid coverage was associated with increased adherence: adjusted adherence ratio 1.580 (95% CI: 1.061-2.352). For high-income GLP-1RA users, higher OOP expenditures were associated with increased adherence in the highest income range.
conclusionsOOP costs for GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i are substantial, potentially posing a particular burden for low-income Medicare beneficiaries. Policy changes may reduce this burden, although adherence improvements appear limited to beneficiaries using SGLT2i.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.