ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Immunoscore: redefining the landscape of colorectal cancer control and care.
Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Immunoscore (IS), introduced by Jerome Galon in the early 2000s, evaluates immune cell densities within tumors, offering a more accurate prediction of clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the TNM system. Studies have demonstrated that IS enhances the prediction of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival in early-stage CRC, identifying high-risk patients and optimizing treatment decisions. The IS serves as a prognostic tool with high predictive value in guiding immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Studies show that high IS scores correlate with better response rates to ICI therapy, facilitating personalized treatment. In addition to CRC, the IS has demonstrated utility across various cancers by predicting treatment responses and survival outcomes. Despite its advantages, the IS faces limitations with traditional tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte assessments. Moreover, the IS's application in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy is constrained by cost and limited data. Nonetheless, advancements combining IS with markers like p21 and p16(INK4a) as well as integrating artificial intelligence and digital pathology, enhance prognostic predictions and patient management. Overall, the IS represents a significant advancement in oncology, with ongoing research likely to further enhance its utility across diverse cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.