Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668290›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Risk factors and prognostic analysis of endometrial cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

Feng Cheng, Li Yang, Qiang Wen, Jianying Xu, Feng Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feng ChengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Li YangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Qiang WenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Jianying XuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Feng ShaoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China. shaofeng@zjcc.org.cn.

Funding

Medical Health Science and Technology Project of the Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission 2021KY580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of lymph node involvement plays a pivotal role in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer (EC), offering essential prognostic information. In this study, we aimed to identify predictors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis, assess survival outcomes, and refine surgical strategies for lymphadenectomy in patients with EC.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 713 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent comprehensive staging surgery between July 2016 and July 2019. Clinical, pathological, and follow-up data were systematically collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors, and survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

resultsAmong 713 patients with endometrial cancer, lymph node metastasis was observed in 70 cases (9.8%), including 43 (6.0%) with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) involvement. Multivariate analysis identified LVSI, pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis, and elevated CA125 as independent predictors of PAN metastasis. Non-endometrioid histologies, particularly serous carcinoma, were associated with significantly higher PAN involvement. The 5-year survival rate for patients with PAN metastasis was 62.8%. Patients with isolated PAN metastasis (PLN - PAN+) had better 5-year OS (78.6%) than those with both PLN and PAN involvement (55.2%), though not statistically significant (log-rank P = 0.173).

conclusionsPara-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis is rare in early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer, and routine dissection may be safely omitted. However, para-aortic lymphadenectomy remains essential for patients with high-risk features, such as non-endometrioid histology, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), pelvic node metastasis, and elevated CA125 levels. Notably, uterine serous carcinoma is associated with frequent nodal spread and poor five-year survival.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerLymphadenectomyPara-aortic lymph node metastasisPrognosisRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40668290
PMCPMC12267712

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.