ArticleScientific reports2025
Unsupervised skull segmentation in MR images utilizing modality translation and super-resolution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skull segmentation from MR images is a complex yet highly desirable task in modern computational medicine. The main challenges are associated with the fact that MRI focuses more on the soft tissues rather than bone structures. While skull segmentation is well-established in CT imaging, the need for MRI-based segmentation arises from the risks associated with CT radiation exposure. In this work, we explore unsupervised skull segmentation by leveraging modality translation methods, transforming the challenge of direct MR segmentation into a more manageable task of modality translation followed by CT-based segmentation. A broad spectrum of deep generative networks is investigated, including generative adversarial networks, denoising diffusion models, and contrastive learning methods, leading to the development of a novel methodology of MRI-based skull segmentation. In this study, we also address the challenge that MR images typically have lower resolution than CT images, while high-resolution CT images are often required for clinical segmentation tasks, hence we additionally employ a robust super-resolution approach. The methodology proposed in this work offers fast inference for volumetric data and outperforms traditional supervised segmentation methods. Additionally, it surpasses a novel foundation medical segmentation model and delivers superior results compared to other modality translation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.