Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670405›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unsupervised skull segmentation in MR images utilizing modality translation and super-resolution.

Kamil Kwarciak, Mateusz Daniol, Daria Hemmerling, Marek Wodzinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamil KwarciakDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, AGH University of Krakow, Kraków, 30-059, Poland. kamil.kwarciak@gmail.com.
Mateusz DaniolDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, AGH University of Krakow, Kraków, 30-059, Poland.
Daria HemmerlingDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, AGH University of Krakow, Kraków, 30-059, Poland.
Marek WodzinskiDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, AGH University of Krakow, Kraków, 30-059, Poland. wodzinski@agh.edu.pl.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju : LIDER13/0038/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skull segmentation from MR images is a complex yet highly desirable task in modern computational medicine. The main challenges are associated with the fact that MRI focuses more on the soft tissues rather than bone structures. While skull segmentation is well-established in CT imaging, the need for MRI-based segmentation arises from the risks associated with CT radiation exposure. In this work, we explore unsupervised skull segmentation by leveraging modality translation methods, transforming the challenge of direct MR segmentation into a more manageable task of modality translation followed by CT-based segmentation. A broad spectrum of deep generative networks is investigated, including generative adversarial networks, denoising diffusion models, and contrastive learning methods, leading to the development of a novel methodology of MRI-based skull segmentation. In this study, we also address the challenge that MR images typically have lower resolution than CT images, while high-resolution CT images are often required for clinical segmentation tasks, hence we additionally employ a robust super-resolution approach. The methodology proposed in this work offers fast inference for volumetric data and outperforms traditional supervised segmentation methods. Additionally, it surpasses a novel foundation medical segmentation model and delivers superior results compared to other modality translation techniques.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSkullAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnsupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40670405
PMCPMC12267848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.