Trial reportScientific reports2025
Evaluating a novel approach to placenta accreta spectrum management: the modified Triple-P technique with cystoinflation (a randomized controlled trial).
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04302545 (Cystoinflation to Prevent Bladder Injury in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Surgery Part 1-Cystoinflation in Repeat C-section Part 2- Cystoinflation in Abdominal Hysterectomy Part3- Cystoinflation in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cystoinflation to Prevent Bladder Injury in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Surgery Part 1-Cystoinflation in Repeat C-section Part 2- Cystoinflation in Abdominal Hysterectomy Part3- Cystoinflation in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Management
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Adaptive Resilience to Catastrophic Systems Collapse: Endothelial Entropy, Ferroptotic Propagation, and the Maternal Point of No Return in Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Narrative Review of Clinical Management, Contemporary Innovations, And Global Challenges.International journal of medical science and dental health · 2026Article
- Subsequent Pregnancies After Conservative Placenta Accreta Management: Recurrent Accreta and Preserved Fertility, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), or morbidly adherent placenta, is a life-threatening condition requiring caesarean section (C-section) and often hysterectomy due to massive postpartum haemorrhage. The widely adopted conservative management-the Triple-P procedure-carries a risk of substantial blood loss. Modifications like blunt bladder dissection and haemostatic suturing can help control bleeding however, bladder injury remains a concern, as identifying vesicouterine planes can be difficult among placental and prior C-sections adhesions. While some studies have used Cystoinflation (retrograde bladder filling) to delineate bladder edges in complex C-sections, its efficacy in preventing bladder injury during PAS surgeries is inconclusive, and no trial has evaluated its integration with the Modified Triple-P technique. To address this gap, we conducted a single-centre, single-blinded controlled trial with 150 women with PAS confirmed during C-section. Participants were randomised to either Modified Triple-P alone or the combined approach with Cystoinflation. Bladder injury, the primary outcome, occurred in 2 (2.7%) of the Cystoinflation group versus 14 (18.7%) of the controls (P < .0001). Secondary outcomes, including blood loss, hysterectomy rates, urologic complications, neonatal outcomes, and fertility, also favoured the combined approach. These results suggest adding Cystoinflation to Modified Triple-P enhances bladder safety and optimises maternal and foetal outcomes in PAS management.Trial registration This trial is a part of project "Cystoinflation to Prevent Bladder Injury in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Surgery" with ethical approval from King Edward Medical University. Trial Registration NCT04302545.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.