ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence of occupational respiratory disease and its determinants among workers in major industrial sectors in Malaysia in 2023.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuing Education Needs of Occupational Health Nurses in the Mining Industry: Implications for Public Health Nursing Workforce Development.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Malaysia, rapid industrial growth has increased workers' exposure to occupational respiratory hazards which consequently leads to an increase in the prevalence of occupational respiratory disease (ORD) among workers. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by investigating the prevalence of ORD and its determinants among workers. This is a cross-sectional study utilizing secondary data from the National Occupational Disease and Prevention 2023 (NODIP) database involving a total of 111,028 participants. Suspected ORD was defined by the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) questionnaire criteria. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to find the determinants of ORD. The overall prevalence of ORD was found to be 8.7%. Most of studied factors were significant determinants of ORD. However, the factors of highest odds ratio (OR) were working in the mining and quarrying (AOR: 14.81; 95% CI: 11.74-18.68; p < 0.001), being of Malaysian nationality (AOR: 4.48; 95% CI: 3.78-5.32; p < 0.001) and working more than 12 hours per day (AOR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.94-2.45, p < 0.001). The findings of this study highlight the importance of regular assessment of the risk of exposure to noxious agents in the workplace and to develop measures for preventing potential adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.