Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670526›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of a prognostic prediction model based on damage-associated molecular pattern for colorectal cancer applying bulk RNA-seq analysis.

Yang Wu, Yangjing Xu, Yongtong Chen, Wei Xu, Minwu Yao, Wencong Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single-cell immune subtyping of basophils in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and a prognostic model based on bulk RNA sequencing.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang WuDigestive Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Guangdong Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528253, China.
Yangjing XuBlood Purification Center, Affiliated Guangdong Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528253, China.
Yongtong ChenBlood Purification Center, Affiliated Guangdong Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528253, China.
Wei XuDigestive Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Guangdong Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528253, China. xuwei83@21cn.com.
Minwu YaoDigestive Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Guangdong Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528253, China. yao.minwu@163.com.
Wencong DingBlood Purification Center, Affiliated Guangdong Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528253, China. freeonh@163.com.

Funding

The Foshan City "14th Five-Year Plan" High Level Medical Key Specialty Construction Project FSGSP145083The Foshan City "14th Five-Year Plan" Traditional Chinese Medicine Specialty Construction Project TSZKJS22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop a risk model for the prognostic prediction for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients according to the phenotype related to damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The data were sourced from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cBioportal databases. The DAMP score was calculated based on the TCGA cohort data using the "ssGSEA" method. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified by the "limma" package were compressed by performing Lasso Cox regression analysis using the "glmnet" package. Subsequently, biomarkers obtained were used to construct a risk model and a nomogram. The CRC subjects were divided by the median RiskScore into low- and high-risk groups. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was conducted, and the "timeROC" package was used for model validation. The "estimate" package, "MCP-COUNTER", "ssGSEA" and "TIDE" were employed to perform immune infiltration analyses. Drug sensitivity analysis and pathway analysis were conducted using the "pRRophetic" package and "ssGSEA", respectively. According to the results, cancer-adjacent samples showed higher DAMP score and immune cell infiltration, lower tumor purity, and a better prognosis. Nine biomarkers (PAH, SIGLEC14, MMP1, JAKMIP1, FCGR3B, KCNT1, SLC2A3, SLC11A1, and HOXC4) were determined to build a reliable risk model, which showed a relatively high AUC value. Notably, patients classified by the model into the high-risk group had a worse prognostic outcome. Furthermore, a nomogram was constructed, and both the nomogram and RiskScore demonstrated a strong predictive power. The results of immune infiltration and drug sensitivity analysis showed higher immune infiltration and greater immunotherapy benefit in the low-risk group. Also, the low-risk group was enriched in immune-related pathways. We developed a reliable DAMP signature for CRC, contributing to the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsRNA-SeqFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNomogramsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorColorectal cancer (CRC)Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP)DEGs analysisPrognostic analysisRiskScore

Identifiers

PMID40670526
PMCPMC12267444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.