ArticleClinical endocrinology2025
Potential Impact of Parental Origin of Inheritance on the Clinical Presentation of Familial Partial Lipodystrophy Type 2 Syndrome.
Article in Clinical endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Variable Expressivity in Type 2 Familial Partial Lipodystrophy Related to a PathogenicThe application of clinical genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextFamilial partial lipodystrophy type 2 (FPLD2) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the LMNA gene. The influence of parental inheritance on clinical presentation has not been fully explored.
objectiveTo investigate the influence of maternal versus paternal inheritance of LMNA variants on the clinical and metabolic phenotype of patients with FPLD2. DESIGN, PATIENTS, MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective cohort study included 83 patients with FPLD2 from four different centres. Clinical, biochemical, and body composition data were analysed. Patients were grouped based on maternal (maternal inheritance group; n = 49) or paternal (paternal inheritance group; n = 34) inheritance of LMNA variants. Statistical comparisons were made between the groups.
resultsPatients in the maternal inheritance group had a younger current age (35 (33) vs. 48 (22) years, p = 0.042) and earlier diagnosis of lipodystrophy (22 (30) vs. 36 (25) years, p = 0.044) compared to those in the paternal inheritance group. Body fat percentages in the arms (23.8 (6.5) % vs. 21.0 (6.2) %, p = 0.034) and trunk (32.1 (10.3) % vs. 28.5 (6.1) %, p = 0.024) were higher in maternal inheritance group. Fatty liver disease (79% vs. 57%, p = 0.029) and pancreatitis (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.033) were more prevalent in paternal inheritance group.
conclusionParental lineage may influence the phenotype of FPLD2: patients with a maternally inherited LMNA variant tend to preserve more adipose tissue in the upper body, while those with a paternally inherited variant experience greater adipose tissue loss in that region, often associated with more severe metabolic complications. These findings highlight the importance of contemplating parental lineage as a relevant factor when evaluating the clinical presentation and management of patients with FPLD2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.