ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2025
Affirming and effective sexual orientation and gender identity data collection: barriers, preferences, and recommendations from the community, clinicians, and staff.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion as scientific rigor: progress during challenging times.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThough sexual and gender minority people experience multiple cancer disparities, they remain largely invisible in oncology clinical care. Despite repeated calls by national medical and oncology organizations to address the lack of sexual orientation and gender identity data, there remains a dearth of information to guide research, clinical care, and creation of national priorities to address important health inequities. We aimed to develop effective strategies to collect sexual orientation and gender identity data within our Midwestern Comprehensive Cancer Center based on barriers and facilitators identified by community members, staff, and clinicians.
methodsWe conducted 5 focus groups of sexual and gender minority and cisgender, heterosexual community members (n = 24). We interviewed clinicians and registration staff across 3 ambulatory cancer clinics (n = 27). Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify themes from focus groups and interviews.
resultsFocus group participants' average age was 37 years with a majority identifying as White (79%, n = 19) and non-Hispanic (92%, n = 22); most participants were women (58%, n = 14) and queer (58%, n = 14). Staff and clinicians' average age was 40 years; most identified as White (82%, n = 22), women (82%, n = 22), and straight (82%, n = 22). Qualitative themes to guide sexual orientation and gender identity data collection included comfort and trust, support services, physical space, training, data collection procedures, data access and privacy, and influence on care.
conclusionsTo encourage patient disclosure, a supportive environment where privacy is upheld and health-care staff are trained to competently interact with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, plus patients is needed. We also share our process of sexual orientation and gender identity data collection implementation at our cancer hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.