ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2025
Targeted intervention and monitoring of sex assigned at birth, sexual orientation, and gender identity data scale-up: the intersection of research, policy, and patient care.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo achieve a paradigm shift in the rigor of sexual and gender minority cancer studies, health systems must integrate sex assigned at birth, sexual orientation, and gender identity (SSOGI) measures into electronic medical records (EMRs) and scale up SSOGI data collection in oncology settings. The SSOGI Collect project sought to identify barriers and facilitators for SSOGI data collection and design a tailored intervention to inform and encourage oncology staff to increase collection in a culturally sensitive manner.
methodsWe employed mixed methods, including qualitative interviews with oncology staff, live training sessions on SSOGI data collection, and monitoring of SSOGI documentation rates in the EMR.
resultsFifteen semistructured interviews with oncology staff were conducted. Forty live training sessions were delivered to health system personnel on SSOGI data collection. After trainings, SSOGI documentation rates increased in both targeted oncology clinics and across the health system as a whole.
conclusionsThe SSOGI Collect project demonstrated that live training sessions are an effective strategy for improving SSOGI data collection in oncology settings. This initiative aligned with an unexpected, broader health system effort to enhance SSOGI data collection in response to new state legislation. This study highlights the importance of tailored interventions for integrating SSOGI data into EMRs, which led to improved data completeness and documentation across oncology clinics and the wider health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.