Evidence mapPaperPMID 40671669Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2025

Deciphering the Physiological Responses to the Intake of Plant-Based Meat Analogues: On the Track of Microbiota and Biomarkers in Serum and Urine.

Guadalupe Sánchez-Terrón, Remigio Martínez, David Morcuende, Mario Estévez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guadalupe Sánchez-TerrónTECAL Research Group, Meat and Meat Products Research Institute (IPROCAR), Universidad de Extremadura (UEX), Cáceres 10003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0838-3803
Remigio MartínezAnimal Health Department, Animal Health and Zoonoses Research Group (GISAZ), UIC Zoonosis and Emergent Diseases (ENZOEM Competitive Research Unit), Universidad of Córdoba (UCO, ROR-ID 05yc77b46), Córdoba 14014, Spain.
David MorcuendeTECAL Research Group, Meat and Meat Products Research Institute (IPROCAR), Universidad de Extremadura (UEX), Cáceres 10003, Spain.
Mario EstévezTECAL Research Group, Meat and Meat Products Research Institute (IPROCAR), Universidad de Extremadura (UEX), Cáceres 10003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-2789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing concerns about the alleged negative outcomes of the consumption of animal-based foods (ABF) lead a number of consumers to demand so-called plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs), which are designed to replicate the sensory and nutritional characteristics of genuine meat. This study aimed to characterize the physiological effects of long-term PBMA consumption by comparing their specific influence on both gut microbiota and fluids (i.e., plasma and urine) with those of conventional beef in a rodent model by using metagenomic and metabolomic tools. Twenty-one Wistar rats were divided into groups and consumed diets made with either wheat- and soy-based meat analogues or beef. The microbiota of PBMA-fed animals showed increased amounts of the harmful genus of gut bacteria, while their metabolomes reflected disturbances in the nitrogen-containing compound metabolism and the presence of potentially harmful metabolites. These results should raise concern and prompt further research into the long-term impact of consumption of PBMAs on health.

Indexed as

BiomarkersGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMeatAnimalsBacteriaCattleGlycine maxHumansMaleRatsRats, WistarTriticumUrineBiomarkersbeefmetabolomicmetagenomicoxidized proteinsseitantofu

Identifiers

PMID40671669
PMCPMC12426926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.