ArticleGland surgery2025
Individualized survival prediction and risk stratification using machine learning for patients with malignant struma ovarii: a population-based study with external validation.
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Selection Metrics and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant struma ovarii (MSO) is a rare thyroid-type cancer originating in ovarian teratoma. Prognosis of MSO is less studied without unanimous staging or stratification system. This study aimed to developed and validated a machine learning (ML)-based model to predict overall survival (OS) for patients with MSO and to risk-stratify them. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed MSO diagnosed in 1975-2021 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were identified as the training cohort. Patients in a systematic literature review were collected as the testing cohort. OS was selected as the outcome, while demographic, clinicopathological and therapeutic information were used as features. Following data encoding, imputing and scaling, univariate feature selection was performed. Cox proportional hazard (CoxPH), Cox with elastic net penalty (CoxNet), random survival forest (RSF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and survival tree (ST) models were trained and tuned. Each model was evaluated on its c-index, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), time-dependent Brier score (BS) and stratification ability in the training and the testing cohort respectively. The algorithm that performed the best in the testing cohort was finally chosen for SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretation and Streamlit web application deployment. Results: The study included 120 and 194 patients in the training and testing cohort respectively. At the end of follow-up (median time 115.5 and 32.5 months respectively), 101 (84.2%) and 181 patients (93.3%) survived respectively. RSF had the best performance in the testing cohort, possessing the highest c-index (0.841, 95% confidence interval: 0.732-0.916), the highest mean AUC (0.852), the lowest integrated BS (0.042), and the smallest P value (<0.001) on log-rank test comparing the stratified groups. According to SHAP, older age, hysterectomy, larger tumor size and more advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage had the strongest predictive power for worse OS among all 13 features. An interactive application (https://mso-surv.streamlit.app/) was then implemented which can display the predicted Kaplan-Meier curve, survival probability, risk stratification and the contributions of features for the output. Conclusions: We reported the first externally tested time-to-event prognostic prediction model for MSO. ML algorithms enabled precise individual-patient prediction and stratification, and can potentially assist patient counselling and decision-making for treatment and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.