ArticleArXiv2025
Circulating tumor cell detection in cancer patients using in-flow deep learning holography.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells found in the bloodstream that serve as biomarkers for early cancer detection, prognostication, and disease monitoring. However, CTC detection remains challenging due to low cell abundance and heterogeneity. Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) offers a promising, label-free method for high-throughput CTC identification by capturing superior morphological information compared to traditional imaging methods, while remaining compatible with in-flow data acquisition. We present a streamlined DHM-based system that integrates microfluidic enrichment with deep learning-driven image analysis, supplemented by immunofluorescent profiling, to improve sensitivity and specificity of CTC enumeration. Specifically, our platform combines inertial microfluidic preprocessing with dual-modality imaging, integrating holography with fluorescence sensing of up to two markers. A deep learning model, trained on a diverse set of healthy blood samples and cancer cell lines, and executed in real-time, provides a morphological confidence on a cell-by-cell basis that may then be combined with immunofluorescence criteria for enumeration. In a pilot study, we demonstrate significantly higher CTC counts in patients with late-stage prostate cancer (n=13) compared to healthy controls (n=8), with a patient-level false positive rate of 1 cell/mL. Notably, nearly two-thirds of identified CTCs were EpCAM-negative but PSMA positive (a prostate specific epithelial marker), suggesting that traditional use of EpCAM as an epithelial marker for CTCs may lead to false negatives. These findings highlight the potential of DHM for applications including but not limited to screening, diagnostics, and precision oncology.
Identifiers
40671945PMC12265574What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.