Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672509›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

GlaucoRAG: A Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model for Expert-Level Glaucoma Assessment.

Mohammad Aminan, S Solomon Darnell, Mohammad Delsoz, Amin Nabavi, Claire Wright, Brian Jerkins, Siamak Yousefi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad AminanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2609-7077
S Solomon DarnellDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4841-4398
Mohammad DelsozDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5638-2034
Amin NabaviDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1688-4245
Claire WrightDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis, Tennessee, United States.
Brian JerkinsDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6999-8014
Siamak YousefiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8633-5730

Funding

Predicting the risk of glaucoma from structural, functional, and genetic factors using artificial intelligenceR01EY033005 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI YOUSEFI, SIAMAK · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Purpose: Accurate glaucoma assessment is challenging because of the complexity and chronic nature of the disease; therefore, there is a critical need for models that provide evidence-based, accurate assessment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capabilities of a glaucoma specialized Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework (GlaucoRAG) that leverages a large language model (LLM) for diagnosing glaucoma and answering to glaucoma specific questions. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic capabilities and knowledge of emerging technologies in glaucoma assessment. Participants: Detailed case reports from 11 patients and 250 multiple choice questions from the Basic and Clinical Science Course (BCSC) Self-Assessment were used to test the LLM based GlaucoRAG. No human participants were involved. Methods: We developed GlaucoRAG, a RAG framework leveraging GPT-4.5-PREVIEW integrated with the R2R platform for automated question answering in glaucoma. We created a glaucoma knowledge base comprising more than 1,800 peer-reviewed glaucoma articles, 15 guidelines and three glaucoma textbooks. The diagnostic performance was tested on case reports and multiple-choice questions. Model outputs were compared with the independent answers of three glaucoma specialists, DeepSeek-R1, and GPT-4.5-PREVIEW (without RAG). Quantitative performance was further assessed with the RAG Assessment (RAGAS) framework, reporting faithfulness, context precision, context recall, and answer relevancy. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was GlaucoRAG's diagnostic accuracy on patient case reports and percentage of correct responses to the BCSC Self-Assessment glaucoma items, compared with the performance of glaucoma specialists and two benchmark LLMs. Secondary outcomes included RAGAS sub scores. Results: GlaucoRAG achieved an accuracy of 81.8% on glaucoma case reports, compared with 72.7% for GPT-4.5-PREVIEW and 63.7% for DeepSeek-R1. On glaucoma BCSC Self-Assessment questions, GlaucoRAG achieved 91.2% accuracy (228 / 250), whereas GPT-4.5-PREVIEW and DeepSeek-R1 attained 84.4% (211 / 250) and 76.0% (190 / 250), respectively. The RAGAS evaluation returned an answer relevancy of 91%, with 80% context recall, 70% faithfulness, and 59% context precision. Conclusions: The glaucoma-specialized LLM, GlaucoRAG, showed encouraging performance in glaucoma assessment and may complement glaucoma research and clinical practice as well as question answering with glaucoma patients.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma Specialized RAG (GlaucoRAG)Large Language Mdoel (LLM)Question Answering (QA)Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

Identifiers

PMID40672509
PMCPMC12265780

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.