SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
A systematic review on the associations between built environment and mental health among older people.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of green exercise on mental health in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous studies have examined the intricate correlation between community and residential environments, and their impact on health outcomes. However, the influence of built environment (BE) factors on the mental well-being of older individuals varies across different geographical regions. Methods: This comprehensive systematic review synthesizes research on the association between BE elements and the mental health (MH) of the older adult population. A pool of 2938 studies were reviewed, with 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria: 17 cross-sectional studies and 4 longitudinal studies. Results: Most of these investigations were conducted in Asian countries and published within the last five years. The findings reveal that the GDS-15 scale is the most commonly used tool for assessing MH outcomes. We have established a quantifiable evaluation framework for BE elements, addressing the limitations of previous studies that relied on subjective perception measurements. Furthermore, a higher proportion of green spaces, improved facility accessibility, and shorter travel times and distances to destinations are positively linked with better MH of older adults. Discussion: While these associations are becoming increasingly evident, research on the effects of density, diversity, and design elements in relation to older adults' MH remains limited and may varied significantly across different regions. Future research should focus on designing quasi-natural experimental studies to enhance our understanding of the convoluted and elaborate relationship between the BE and MH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.