ReviewPulmonary circulation2025
Enhancing Drug Development for Paediatric Pulmonary Hypertension-An Integrative Perspective.
Review in Pulmonary circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sotatercept in Children with Pulmonary Hypertension-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As with adult pulmonary hypertension (PH), high morbidity and mortality persist with diverse types of paediatric PH. Despite major advances in pharmacologic therapies based on extensive studies in adult PH, few drugs have been comprehensively studied in neonates, infants, and children, leaving current paediatric PH care largely dependent on small observational studies and extrapolation of evidence from adult clinical trials. Challenges in developing successful clinical trials in children include the need to define distinct disease phenotypes with well-characterised natural history and outcomes, the lack of established age- and disease-specific study endpoints, small and heterogeneous paediatric populations, and the common off-label use of PH-targeted drug therapies without regulatory approval. From a regulatory perspective, sufficient studies of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in neonates and young children are often lacking, and the potential role for bridging biomarkers has been underexplored. Additional opportunities include developing innovative trial designs, employing real-world data from existing registries, and fostering collaborations among sponsors, regulatory authorities, physicians, patients, and their families. By reducing reliance on off-label drug use and leveraging paediatric PH registry data, this approach offers a path toward more effective and evidence-based treatment protocols for paediatric patients. This review provides an overview of integrated international perspectives from an interprofessional platform that includes academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory agencies surrounding the future design of clinical trials for paediatric PH. Ongoing evaluation and adaptation of these strategies will be essential for ensuring that paediatric PH patients receive the highest standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.