Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673126›Full record

ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025

Potential of ChatGPT in youth mental health emergency triage: Comparative analysis with clinicians.

Samanvith Thotapalli, Musa Yilanli, Ian McKay, William Leever, Eric Youngstrom, Karah Harvey-Nuckles, Kimberly Lowder, Steffanie Schweitzer, Erin Sunderland, Daniel I Jackson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samanvith ThotapalliDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5484-7336
Musa YilanliDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5007-5041
Ian McKayDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
William LeeverDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Eric YoungstromDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Karah Harvey-NucklesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Kimberly LowderDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Steffanie SchweitzerNationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.
Erin SunderlandNationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.
Daniel I JacksonThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.
Emre SezginDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Large language models, such as GPT-4, are increasingly integrated into healthcare to support clinicians in making informed decisions. Given ChatGPT's potential, it is necessary to explore such applications as a support tool, particularly within mental health telephone triage services. This study evaluates whether GPT Models can accurately triage psychiatric emergency vignettes and compares its performance to that of clinicians. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed to assess the performance of three different GPT-4 models (GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini, and GPT-4 Legacy) in psychiatric emergency triage. Twenty-two psychiatric emergency vignettes, intended to represent realistic prehospital triage scenarios, were initially drafted using ChatGPT and subsequently reviewed and refined by the research team to ensure clinical accuracy and relevance. The GPT-4 models independently generated clinical responses to the vignettes over three iterations to ensure consistency. Thereafter, two advanced practice nurse practitioners independently assessed these responses utilizing a 3-point Likert-type scale for the main triage criteria: risk level ( Results: GPT Models had an average admission score of 1.73 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.45; scale: Conclusion: This study indicates that GPT Models may serve as supportive decision-support tools in mental health telephone triage, particularly for psychiatric emergencies. Although response variability across iterations was minimal, most discrepancies in admission decisions were identified as false positives, reflecting that GPT Models may have a tendency to over-triage relative to clinician judgment. Further investigation is needed to establish robust structure to increase alignment with clinical decisions and response relevance in clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceemergencymental healthsuicidetriage

Identifiers

PMID40673126
PMCPMC12264314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.