ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Predicting the risk of depression in older adults with disability using machine learning: an analysis based on CHARLS data.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning for the Analysis of Healthy Lifestyle Data: Scoping Review and Guidelines.JMIR human factors · 2026Guideline
- Heterogeneous and nonlinear associations between depressive symptoms and functional disability in older Chinese adults.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Machine learning model based on routine blood and biochemical parameters for early diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Depression Risk Prediction Models for Older Adults Analyzing From the Perspective of the Health Ecology Model: A Scoping Review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Developing and Interpreting a Machine Learning Model for Identifying Liver Metastasis in Gastric Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advancement of artificial intelligence technologies has opened new avenues for depression prevention and management in older adults with disability (defined by basic or instrumental activities of daily living, BADL/IADL). This study systematically developed machine learning (ML) models to predict depression risk in disabled elderly individuals using longitudinal data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), providing a potentially generalizable tool for early screening. Methods: This study utilized longitudinal data from the CHARLS 2011-2015 cohort. A three-stage serial consensus approach feature selection framework (LASSO, Elastic Net, and Boruta) was employed to identify 21 robust predictors from 74 candidate variables. Ten ML algorithms were evaluated: LR, HistGBM, MLP, XGBoost, bagging, DT, LightGBM, RF, SVM, and CatBoost. Temporal external validation was performed using an independent 2018-2020 cohort to assess model generalizability. Performance was comprehensively evaluated using accuracy, AUC, F1-score, precision, and recall metrics. The SHAP framework was employed to interpret feature contribution mechanisms. Results: Results demonstrated that the HistGBM model achieved optimal overall performance on the testing sets (AUC = 0.779, F1-score = 0.735, accuracy = 0.713), with only an 8.5% AUC difference between training and testing sets and a 10% difference between external validation and testing sets, indicating temporal stability. SHAP interpretability analysis revealed that sleep time (mean SHAP value = 0.344) in the health behavior domain and life satisfaction (0.339) and episodic memory (0.220) in the subjective perception domain contributed more significantly to prediction than traditional biomedical indicators. Conclusion: This study developed an AI-based tool for depression risk assessment in older adults with disability through a multi-stage feature selection process and a temporal external validation framework. These findings provide a practical screening instrument and a methodological reference for implementing AI technologies in geriatric mental health applications, thereby facilitating clinical translation of predictive analytics in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.