ArticleMolecular microbiology2025
Filamentation Profiling Reveals Multiple Transcription Regulators Contributing to the Differences Between Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.
Article in Molecular microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Candida dubliniensis is the most closely related species to C. albicans, one of the leading causes of fungal infections in humans. However, despite sharing many characteristics, C. dubliniensis is significantly less pathogenic. To better understand the molecular underpinnings of these dissimilarities, we focused on the regulation of filamentation, a developmental trait fundamental for host colonization. We generated a collection of 44 C. dubliniensis null mutants of transcription regulators whose orthologs in C. albicans had been previously implicated in filamentous growth. These regulators are very similar at the sequence level, but phenotypic screening identified several mutants with contrasting interspecific filamentation phenotypes beyond previously known differences. Bcr1, a well-known regulator of biofilm formation, stands out as its mutant mainly showed a filamentation defect in C. dubliniensis. Phenotypic and transcriptional characterization showed that the bcr1 defect is condition dependent and that this regulator plays a central role in the filamentation of C. dubliniensis, possibly by regulating the hyphal activator Ume6. Overall, our results suggest that several regulatory pathways are involved in the filamentation differences between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis and show that the C. dubliniensis mutant collection is a valuable resource to compare, at a molecular level, these species of medical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.