ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure and history of malignancy: Data from Swedish Heart Failure Registry and the National Cancer Register.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardio-Oncologic Considerations in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Malignancies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Determinants of cancer mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Baseline vs. on-treatment heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in a real world cardio-oncology clinic: observational analysis of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity incidence and cancer treatment implications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- What's new in heart failure? November 2025.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsWhether a history of malignancy affects heart failure (HF) management and prognosis is unclear. In HF randomized controlled trials, enrolment has been limited to patients with a cancer diagnosis at least 2 years before screening. We investigated clinical profile, HF treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with a history of cancer of >2 years. METHODS AND
resultsAmong 53 314 patients included in the Swedish HF Registry between 2000 and 2020, 9066 (17%) had previous cancer (diagnosed >2 years prior to index date), most frequently of prostate (26%), breast (15%), colon (11%), and haematologic system (11%). Previous cancer was associated with older age, female sex, comorbidity burden, and less likely specialized follow-up. Over a median follow-up of 2.4 (0.0-5.0) years, mortality rates were 24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 23-25) and 18 (95% CI 18-19) per 100 subject-years in patients with versus without previous cancer, respectively. Cancer accounted for 16% of deaths in the previous cancer group and for 5.6% in the no-cancer group. Previous cancer was independently associated with higher risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18), non-cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.31-1.44), and first all-cause hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.14). The risk of non-cardiovascular death declined with increasing time from cancer diagnosis. In patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), previous cancer was associated with less frequent use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, triple pharmacotherapy, and HF devices.
conclusionsPrevious cancer was common among patients with HF, and it was associated with comorbidity burden, non-cardiovascular outcomes and, in HFrEF, with lower use of guideline-recommended therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.