Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673963›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025

Intravenous thrombolysis in the context of stroke and cancer.

Alessandra Burini, Maurizio Paciaroni, Lucio D'Anna, Fedra Kuris, Valentina Maniaci, Mariarosaria Valente, Gian Luigi Gigli, Giovanni Merlino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Thrombosis in patients with cancer: challenges and advances.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessandra BuriniClinical Neurology, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy. alessandra.burini96@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-2441
Maurizio PaciaroniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-8795
Lucio D'AnnaDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6235-2795
Fedra KurisClinical Neurology, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4708-4316
Valentina ManiaciSOC Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Gorizia and Monfalcone Hospital, Gorizia, Italy.
Mariarosaria ValenteClinical Neurology, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6077-1315
Gian Luigi GigliClinical Neurology, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3526-1414
Giovanni MerlinoClinical Neurology, Department of Head-Neck and Neuroscience, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASU FC), Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6525-9529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients are at an increased risk for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Ischemic stroke in this population often presents with distinctive features, such as cryptogenic etiology and multiple ischemic lesions, and is driven by cancer-associated coagulopathy, complicating management strategies.

methodsWe reviewed current literature on intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients through PubMed search with no time limits. We included international guidelines, meta-analyses, cohort studies, and case series to evaluate its safety and efficacy. This descriptive review aims to evaluate the risks and benefits of thrombolytic treatment in patients with acute stroke and cancer. DISCUSSION: Despite limited high-quality evidence (no randomized trial), studies suggest that IVT is generally safe and effective in cancer patients with ischemic stroke. However, treatment should be individualized, considering specific contraindications and the patient's tumor characteristics. The 2019 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines contraindicate IVT in patients with gastrointestinal or intra-axial tumors; conversely, these conditions are not explicitly mentioned in the 2021 European Stroke Organization guidelines, as recent studies have not proven them to be at higher risk per se. Particular attention should be given to coagulation abnormalities, recent surgery, and concomitant medications. Thus, cautious and multidisciplinary management is needed. Further research is essential to define risk stratification for this complex population better. Multicentered, well-designed prospective studies are crucial and should also differentiate patients based on tumor site, histology, and molecular characteristics that could impact both thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk.

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsIschemic StrokeNeoplasmsStrokeThrombolytic TherapyAdministration, IntravenousHumansFibrinolytic AgentsBest practiceCancerGuidelinesIntravenous thrombolysisStrokeStroke management

Identifiers

PMID40673963
PMCPMC12611991

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.