ArticleGut and liver2025
Comparison of the Efficacy of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Diabetic Patients with Steatotic Liver Disease.
Article in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend one oral hypoglycemic agent over another for diabetic patients to reduce hepatic steatosis or prevent advanced fibrosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods: This study included diabetic patients with steatotic liver disease who newly received either a DPP-4i or an SGLT-2i as a second-line treatment between 2014 and 2021 at a single tertiary hospital. MASLD was categorized as MASLD-H (radiologic steatosis with a hepatic steatosis index [HSI]>36) or MASLD-I (radiologic steatosis only). Changes in the HSI and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index were compared at 1 and 3 years after treatment initiation. Results: A total of 3,493 patients were consecutively enrolled, with 3,001 receiving DPP-4i treatment and 492 receiving SGLT-2i treatment. After applying propensity score matching, the SGLT-2i group showed a significantly greater reduction in the HSI than the DPP-4i group in the DM-MASLD population at both 1 year (DM-MASLD-H: DPP-4i vs SGLT-2i, -1.4% vs -3.7%, p<0.001; DM-MASLD-I: -1.3% vs -3.8%, p<0.001) and 3 years (DM-MASLD-H: -2.0% vs -4.0%, p=0.001; DM-MASLD-I: -2.4% vs -4.2, p=0.025). The FIB-4 indices of both groups increased; however, the increase at year 1 was more significant in the DPP-4i than in the SGLT-2i group (DM-MASLD-H: 11.4% vs 5.2%, p<0.001; DM-MASLD-I: 10.7% vs 4.3%, p=0.014). Conclusions: In patients with DM-MASLD, SGLT-2i treatment was associated with a greater reduction in hepatic steatosis and delayed fibrotic progression than DPP-4i treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.