Trial reportScientific reports2025
Efficacy of a theory-based and tailored mHealth intervention promoting walking behavior: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05620888 (Efficacy of a Tailored Communication Intervention Aimed At Increasing the Number of Daily Steps), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of a Tailored Communication Intervention Aimed At Increasing the Number of Daily Steps
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Food Choices Among University Students: Dietary Identity, Decision-Making Motives, and Contextual Influences.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Step by step: promoting daily walking through a mHealth intervention.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical inactivity is one of the core risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Scaling up health interventions using theoretically-driven and smart-enabled approaches is critical to strengthening prevention strategies. This study evaluated the efficacy of an ad-hoc developed mobile health (mHealth) intervention, which adopts a theory-based and tailored communication approach and targets walking behavior change. A convenience sample of physically inactive adults (n = 193) participated in a 30-day randomized trial. Before the intervention, psychological variables selected from the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) were evaluated to profile participants and develop tailored materials. Allocation (1:1:1) was performed to one of three conditions: (i) tailored communication based on the HAPA model (HAPA-T group); (ii) non-tailored communication focused on wellbeing (Wellbeing-NT group); (iii) no-communication group. All participants were also exposed to goal-setting (i.e., reaching 7,000 steps daily) and self-monitoring. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed to monitor the mean weekly steps over the 30-days trial period within and among the three conditions. Overall, participants reported significant improvements in walking behavior over the trial period. Although no significant outcome differences were observed among the three experimental conditions, differential patterns of walking emerged from the study groups, with the HAPA-T group showing a wider increase at the final time-point. The intervention showed a significant overall impact, unveiling crucial procedural strengths and limitations. These were discussed to orient optimized implementation for future digital full-scale trials.Trial Protocol Registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration ID NCT05620888 (17
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.