ArticleScientific reports2025
CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of CO₂ or electrical stunning to render pigs unconscious and insensible before exsanguination is a common practice. Although both methods are widely implemented, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms, and studies have produced conflicting results regarding their influence on meat quality. In the case of CO₂ stunning, impaired pulmonary gas exchange causes a rapid onset of systemic hypoxia, accompanied by hypercapnia, which in turn lowers blood pH and triggers additional physiological stress responses. Electrical stunning, by contrast, induces a generalized epileptic seizure by depolarizing neuronal cell membranes, markedly increasing oxygen consumption in both the brain and peripheral muscles. Coupled with apnea-induced cessation of respiration, this leads to rapid systemic hypoxia and associated metabolic disturbances. With this study, we aim to generate comprehensive metabolic data as a foundation for deeper understanding of the animal's physiological responses depending on the stunning method used. We identified differences in metabolite pathways associated with the stunning method and evaluated potential influence on early post mortem processes relevant to meat quality development. After CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.