ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Management of Insomnia Complaints by Non-Sleep Specialist Physicians: A French DELPHI Consensus.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of the "Not Better Explained" Diagnosis Criteria in Sleep Disorder Classifications: A Systematic Content Analysis and Critical Review.Journal of sleep research · 2026Review
- Management of Insomnia Complaints by Non-Sleep Specialist Physicians: A French DELPHI Consensus.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- A Sleep and Circadian Biomarker-Based Predictive Model for Differentiating Unipolar and Bipolar Depression.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
- A Modified Delphi Consensus on Optimal Pharmacological Management of Insomnia: Insights from a Malaysian Perspective.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder and a major public health concern, affecting chronically up to 19% of the adult population in France. Despite its significant impact on quality of life, mental health, and cardiometabolic disease, insomnia disorder remains underdiagnosed and inadequately managed. General Practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in addressing insomnia complaints but often face constraints, such as limited consultation time and a lack of specialised training. To provide practical recommendations for non-sleep specialist physicians, a French Delphi consensus was conducted based on recent expert guidelines. A multidisciplinary Steering Committee formulated 21 clinical statements regarding the evaluation, severity assessment, management, and referral to sleep specialists of patients presenting with insomnia disorder. These statements were submitted to a panel of 37 GPs across France via two rounds of anonymous rating using a 9-point Likert scale. While a consensus was reached for 95% of the statements, encompassing initial evaluation, sleep hygiene recommendations, behavioural interventions, and referral criteria, controversies emerged regarding the prescription of hypnotics, underscoring areas requiring further clarification and education. Our results highlight the importance of tailored approaches in primary care, emphasising pragmatic strategies rather than highly specialised protocols. This French Delphi consensus provides a structured yet flexible framework to support insomnia disorder management by non-sleep specialist physicians, bridging the gap between guidelines and real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.