Evidence mapPaperPMID 40676890Full record

ReviewThe world journal of men's health2025

Sex and Gender Differences in Obesity: Biological, Sociocultural, and Clinical Perspectives.

Hyeyoon Kim, Sung-Eun Kim, Mi-Kyung Sung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyeyoon KimDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7439-9556
Sung-Eun KimDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. sekim@sookmyung.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1472-2405
Mi-Kyung SungDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. mksung@sookmyung.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-5628

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1A2C1004626National Research Foundation of Korea 2023R1A2C1005313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex and gender differences significantly influence the prevalence of obesity, patterns of fat distribution, metabolic health outcomes, and responses to treatment. While women generally exhibit a higher overall prevalence of obesity, men are more susceptible to visceral fat accumulation, which increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes, and other obesity-related complications. This review examines the biological, genetic, and sociocultural foundations of sex-based differences in obesity. Estrogen plays a crucial role in regulating subcutaneous fat deposition and brown adipose tissue (BAT) activity in women, whereas men tend to accumulate more visceral fat and demonstrate reduced BAT thermogenic function. Genetic investigations, including genome-wide association studies, have identified sex-specific loci associated with central adiposity and fat metabolism. Additionally, emerging research indicates distinct gut microbiome profiles between obese men and women. Sociocultural and psychosocial factors, such as gender norms, body image perception, and healthcare-seeking behavior, also influence the risk and management of obesity. Women are more inclined to seek treatment and participate in structured weight-loss programs, while men often face under diagnosis due to stigma and limited healthcare access. These sex-based differences are evident in comorbidities, with women being more vulnerable to obesity-related cancers and mental health disorders, whereas men experience an earlier onset of CVD and diabetes. Despite these distinctions, most obesity interventions lack gender-specific considerations. This review underscores the necessity for sex- and gender-tailored strategies in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of obesity. A more nuanced understanding of these differences can improve clinical outcomes and inform policy development for equitable obesity care.

Indexed as

ComorbidityEstrogensGend identityObesityPrevention & controlSex

Identifiers

PMID40676890
PMCPMC12505483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.