ReviewPsychological medicine2025
Placebo and nocebo phenomena in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a narrative review on current knowledge and potential future directions.
Review in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of early life adversity on socially learned analgesia and empathy in virtual reality.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Placebo and Nocebo Phenomena in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Narrative Review on Current Knowledge and Potential Future Directions - CORRIGENDUM.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of childhood adversity on socially learned placebo analgesia in virtual reality: A cross-sectional study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The experience of psychosis in schizophrenia spectrum disorders involves significant distress and functional impairment, contributing to immense social and economic costs. Current gold standard treatment guidelines emphasize the use of antipsychotic medications, though responses to these treatments vary widely, with the potential for detrimental side effects. However, increasing placebo responses in randomized controlled trials since the 1960s complicate the development of new medications. Elevated placebo responses are common in psychiatric populations, including those with psychosis, and are influenced by individual beliefs and prior experiences. Despite extensive research on placebo mechanisms in conditions such as depression and pain, little is known about mechanisms of these effects in psychosis. This narrative review examines the predictors and belief formation processes underlying placebo and nocebo phenomena in psychosis. We discuss features of randomized controlled trials for antipsychotic medications, individual symptom heterogeneity, and contextual factors. Findings related to placebo effects for motivation and cognition-enhancing drugs are also discussed. We then consider the possibility that theories of predictive coding and aberrant salience provide explanation for aspects of both placebo effects and schizophrenia spectrum symptoms. The role of outcome expectations broadly and in the context of reward processing is considered. We conclude with some recommendations for future placebo research in psychosis, emphasizing the diversity of placebo effects, assessment concerns, cultural considerations, and methodological aspects. Future multidisciplinary research is required to further elucidate placebo effects in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.