ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Improving T2D machine learning-based prediction accuracy with SNPs and younger age.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From omics to AI-mapping the pathogenic pathways in type 2 diabetes.FEBS letters · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether integrating clinical and genomic data improves the performance of machine learning (ML) models for predicting Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) risk. Methods: Six models-Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Machine, and Decision Tree-were trained and tested on a discovery dataset (N=3,546) and validated in the UK Biobank (N=31,620). Model performance was assessed using clinical data alone, combined clinical and genomic data, and in age-specific groups (>55 and ≤55 years). Results: The inclusion of genomic data modestly improved model performance across all algorithms in the discovery dataset. Clinical features such as family history of T2D and hypertension consistently ranked as top features. When SNPs were added, T2D-associated variants, including rs2943641 ( Conclusions: While traditional clinical factors remained the strongest predictors of T2D risk, integration of genomic data produced a modest improvement in model performance, especially among younger adults. Validation across independent datasets confirmed the generalizability of these findings, underscoring the value of multi-dimensional risk-prediction models to refine T2D risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.