Evidence mapPaperPMID 40677239Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Improving T2D machine learning-based prediction accuracy with SNPs and younger age.

Cynthia Al Hageh, Andreas Henschel, Hao Zhou, Jorge Zubelli, Moni Nader, Stephanie Chacar, Nantia Iakovidou, Haralampos Hatzikirou, Antoine Abchee, Siobhán O'Sullivan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cynthia Al HagehDepartment of Public Health & Epidemiology, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Andreas HenschelDepartment of Computer Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Hao ZhouDepartment of Biological Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Jorge ZubelliDepartment of Mathematics, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Moni NaderDepartment of Medical Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Stephanie ChacarDepartment of Medical Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Nantia IakovidouDepartment of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Haralampos HatzikirouDepartment of Mathematics, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Antoine AbcheeFaculty of Medicine, University of Balamand, Lebanon.
Siobhán O'SullivanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Pierre A ZallouaDepartment of Public Health & Epidemiology, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether integrating clinical and genomic data improves the performance of machine learning (ML) models for predicting Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) risk. Methods: Six models-Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Machine, and Decision Tree-were trained and tested on a discovery dataset (N=3,546) and validated in the UK Biobank (N=31,620). Model performance was assessed using clinical data alone, combined clinical and genomic data, and in age-specific groups (>55 and ≤55 years). Results: The inclusion of genomic data modestly improved model performance across all algorithms in the discovery dataset. Clinical features such as family history of T2D and hypertension consistently ranked as top features. When SNPs were added, T2D-associated variants, including rs2943641 ( Conclusions: While traditional clinical factors remained the strongest predictors of T2D risk, integration of genomic data produced a modest improvement in model performance, especially among younger adults. Validation across independent datasets confirmed the generalizability of these findings, underscoring the value of multi-dimensional risk-prediction models to refine T2D risk assessment.

Indexed as

AIMachine LearningPredictive modelsT2D

Identifiers

PMID40677239
PMCPMC12270010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.