ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
Porous granular hydrogel scaffolds biofabricated from dual-crosslinked hydrogel microparticles for breast tissue engineering.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Porcelain-clay-inspired microsphere hydrogel bioink facilitates bone regeneration via immune-osteogenic regulation.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- DLP bioprinting of cartilage organoid-laden bioinks yields high-fidelity auricular constructs with enhanced chondrogenesis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Sodium Alginate Hydrogel with Zinc Ion Nanoparticles for Synergistic Neuroprotection and Functional Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury.Marine drugs · 2026Article
- Oxygen-releasing scaffolds in tissue engineering: design strategies, fabrication and regenerative applications.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Functionalized magnetic hydrogel encapsulation of human dental follicle stem cells under a static magnetic field enhances multi-site bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Tailorable porous collagen hydrogels as a physiologically relevant platform for extrachromosomal DNA-associated colorectal cancer research.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Engineering Resilience: How Irradiation Strategies Influence 3D-Bioprinted Adipose Stem Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Micro/nano-robotic medical device: preparation, actuation mechanisms and their applications in medicine.RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogel scaffolds play a crucial role in tissue engineering; however, traditional bulk hydrogel scaffolds (BHS) often suffer from insufficiently sized pores (nanoscales), impeding cellular infiltration, development, and expansion. This limitation affects oxygen and nutrient exchange efficiency, in which case it relies extensively on liquid permeation and bulk hydrogels swelling. In contrast, hydrogel microparticles (HMPs) have proven to be both printable and injectable, allowing the development of modular thick constructs with interconnected pores. This study introduces a novel method of fabricating porous granular hydrogel scaffolds (GHS) by printing thermo-crosslinked gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) HMPs granular hydrogels before chemical crosslinking (dual-crosslinking). The scaffolds exhibit an average pore fraction ranging from 14 % to 23 % and an average pore size varying from 4923 μm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.