ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Pancreatoscopy in the evaluation and management of pancreatic disorders.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peroral Pancreatoscopy for Differentiating Main Duct IPMN from Chronic Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review and a Case Series.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [On familiar terms with the bile and pancreatic ducts : Where is the benefit?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatoscopy is an advanced endoscopic technique that enables high-resolution imaging of the main pancreatic duct. Its relevance has grown in recent years with the introduction of novel technologies, allowing for both diagnosis and treatment within a single procedure. In therapeutic applications, it facilitates interventions such as stone fragmentation, stone retrieval, and tumor-related obstruction management. In diagnostic applications, it improves the accuracy of biopsies for suspicious lesions, particularly in cases of cystic neoplasms, indeterminate strictures, and pancreatic fistula assessments. The most common complications include post-procedural pancreatitis and self-limited abdominal pain, with their incidence mitigated by prophylactic anti-inflammatory drugs and pancreatic stent placement. Despite being limited by the need for specialized equipment and trained personnel, technological advancements may position pancreatoscopy as a first-line tool in modern clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.