ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable HCC: Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic treatment paradigms for unresectable and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Identification of the CYP19A1-GPER1 axis as a critical oncogenic driver in hepatocellular carcinoma via AKT activation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Radiologic Response Assessment With RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Potential of Small Nucleolar RNA Host Genes in the Carcinogenesis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Prospects: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) is a standard-of-care treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Verification of its effectiveness outside clinical trials is an area of unmet need, especially in estimating long-term survival outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane libraries to evaluate therapy outcomes in patients treated with frontline A+B for uHCC outside trials. Pooled estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 and 12 months were calculated from individual patient-level data using random-effects analysis. Results: Of 2,179 patients selected from 12 cohorts, 80.5% were male, median age was 66 years (IQR 61.6-73.0), 61.6% had advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 83.6% were Child-Pugh (CP) class A. Pooled 6- and 12-month OS was 82% (95% CI: 76-86%; Conclusions: The effectiveness of A+B after registration mirrors its efficacy estimates from clinical trial datasets. Long-term survival at 24 months can be achieved in up to 39% of patients with uHCC treated with A+B in routine clinical practice. Impact and implications: This study provides real-world evidence supporting the long-term efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, showing survival outcomes similar to those achieved in clinical trials. These findings are important for clinicians in supporting A+B as a frontline treatment, particularly for patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function. They also offer valuable insights for policymakers and researchers for optimising treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of potential variability in patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.