ReviewBioactive materials2025
Strategic advances in Vat Photopolymerization for 3D printing of calcium phosphate-based bone scaffolds: A review.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent responsive alloy scaffold temporally regulates the immune-osteogenic axis for the treatment of infectious bone defects.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Metamaterial-Based Soft Sensors: Materials, Design, and Fabrications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Biomimetic bone calcium phosphate-based scaffolds fabricated via ceramic vat photopolymerization: Effect of porosity, sintering temperature, mineralogical phases and trace elements on the osteogenic potential.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Graphene oxide coating on two-dimensional glass substrates and three-dimensional zirconia scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D-printing has emerged as a leading technology for fabricating personalized scaffolds for bone regeneration. Among the 3D-printing technologies, vat photopolymerization (VP) stands out for its high precision and versatility. It enables the creation of complex, patient-specific scaffolds with advanced pore architectures that enhance mechanical stability and promote cell growth, key factors for effective bone regeneration. This review provides an overview of the advances made in vat photopolymerization printing of calcium phosphates, covering both the fabrication of full ceramic bodies and polymer-calcium phosphate composites. The review examines key aspects of the fabrication process, including slurry composition, architectural design, and printing accuracy, highlighting their impact on the mechanical and biological performance of 3D-printed scaffolds. The need to tailor porosity, pore size, and geometric design to achieve both mechanical integrity and biological functionality is emphasized by a review of data published in the recent literature. This review demonstrates that advanced geometries like Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces and nature-inspired designs, achievable with exceptional precision by this technology, enhance mechanical and osteogenic performance. In summary, VP's versatility, driven by the diversity of material options, consolidation methods, and precision opens new horizons for scaffold-based bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.